These days, I have to keep lookin g back every time I’m walkin g on
pavements and footpaths as I’m fearful of what’s comin g from behin d me at high speed and knockin g me down.
Who’s goin g to pay for my medical treatments when I’m in jured on public footpath?
Ever sin ce the
floodgates were opened for PMD (personal
mobility devices) like e-scooters and hoverboards on shared walkways, I’m now exposed
and subject to this unnecessary risk of in jury. Such devices are loosely controlled here and they have
proliferated everywhere. Our in frastructure
is not yet ready to embrace these technologies as our pavements and footpaths
are just too narrow to allow even 2 pedestrians to walk astride, let alone PMD users and cyclists who are speedin g at 25km/h or faster. Public safety is now compromised even if I’m
already walkin g at the frin ge.
I keep wonderin g why the authority allowed the maximum speed limit to be set at 25km/h.
Shouldn’t it be capped at 5-8km/h similar to walkin g speed to reduce accidents and risk of in juries to pedestrians and other users?
It sounds so good on paper to allow PMD users to use pavements and walkways and ask all users to be gracious to
share footpaths. What the heck if I cannot protect myself? Policy-makers
probably never use footpaths in their daily
activities and would never understand the predicament of walkin g on one.
From 15 Jan, LTA (Land Transport Authority) is lashin g out harsher penalties on PMD users ridin g on public roads and expressways. I expect more PMD users on our footpaths and pavements, meanin g I’m exposed to even more risks on footpaths. They should never been
allowed on footpaths in the first place.
For the new year, many said: Look ahead, never look
back!
I must say: to survive in our ‘squeezed’ environment, look ahead but never never look back.
No comments:
Post a Comment